Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) last week released a consultation
paper on proposals to revise its Hedge Funds Guidelines, which cover all retail
hedge funds offered in the SAR.
The Guidelines are contained in Chapter 8.7 of the Code on Unit Trusts and
Mutual Funds and were published in May 2002. The objective of the HF Guidelines
is to regulate hedge funds that are offered to the retail public in Hong Kong.
Given their retail nature, SFC-authorised hedge funds are required to comply
with specific disclosure requirements and implement structural safeguards in
accordance with the HF Guidelines. Hedge funds not offered to the public do
not fall under the jurisdiction of the HF Guidelines.
Since the launch of HF Guidelines, the SFC has authorised 13 hedge funds. Five
are single hedge funds and the remaining eight are funds of hedge funds (FoHFs).
As of 31 March 2005, the total net asset size of the SFC-authorised hedge funds
was about US$1.2 billion.
In view of the rapid development in the hedge funds industry, the SFC considers
it desirable to revise the HF Guidelines in order to enhance the regulatory
regime for SFC-authorised hedge funds.
Mrs Alexa Lam, SFC’s Executive Director of Intermediaries and Investment
Products, said: “We seek to adopt a more pragmatic approach on individual
assessment of hedge fund applications to ensure that the right balance is struck
between market facilitation and investor protection.”
The proposed revisions to the HF Guidelines aim to serve three key objectives:
(1) strengthen the assessment criteria of managers of SFC-authorised hedge
funds, and provide greater flexibility in recognising the experience of fund
manager’s key personnel;
(2) enhance the measures for safeguarding investors’ interest and the
level of transparency; and
(3) codify existing practices of the SFC in authorising hedge funds and provide
additional guidance to the interpretation of the provisions in the HF Guidelines.
Says the SFC:
'The hedge funds industry is a skill and resource intensive industry. In view
of the rapid market development especially the increasing use of complex investment
strategies and investments in non-traditional asset types by hedge funds managers,
the SFC proposes to take a holistic approach in reviewing the acceptability
of a manager for SFC-authorised hedge funds in that not only does a manager
have to have two key personnel with the requisite experience, the manager as
a firm must also demonstrate that there are the necessary internal systems,
resources and risk management process in place to manage the hedge funds business.'
Under the SFC proposals, each of the two key personnel must have at least two
years’ specific investment management experience in hedge funds out of
a total of five years’ experience. The rest of the experience can be made
up of general experience in a wide spectrum of activities related to hedge funds
strategies, such as experience in proprietary trading, securities dealings or
funds selection.
The SFC proposes that additional disclosure be made in specific areas relating
to the operation of SFC-authorised hedge funds. These include the calculation
of performance fees chargeable by managers, the risk management process and
the relationship between the funds and their prime brokers. The SFC also proposes
to make it mandatory for all SFC-authorised hedge funds to have independent
valuation.
“Investment units are priced, and are purchased and redeemed by retail
investors on the basis of the valuation of the fund. The manager’s fees
are also based on this valuation. Therefore, it serves a key function of investor
protection that the fund is independently valued,” Mrs Lam said.
To provide further guidance on the application of the authorisation requirements,
the SFC proposes to insert practical notes in the revised HF Guidelines to reflect
the existing regulatory practices. For example, in view of the potential risks
to investors, direct proprietary trading by a FoHF is not allowed in general
as this may affect the overall risk profile and investment objectives of the
FoHF or even result in a spillover of liabilities to the fund as a whole. This
prohibition is proposed to be codified as a note to the HF Guidelines.
The SFC also invites comments on two specific proposals for the revision of
the HF Guidelines:
(1) The lowering of the current minimum subscription level for SFC-authorised
single hedge funds from US$50,000 to US$30,000; and
(2) The relaxation of the current restriction imposed on the level of collateralisation
to prime brokers for SFC-authorised hedge funds.
Mrs Lam said: “Investor’s interest always comes first when we regulate
investment products for public offering. Hedge funds may be exposed to higher
risks due to rapid market movements and volatility of various asset classes.
As such, hedge fund managers should ensure that they have taken the necessary
measures to control all risks involved in managing their hedge funds. Distributors
of hedge funds are also expected to fully understand the investment risks involved
in the products to avoid any possible mis-selling to the public. Investors should
assess the product’s suitability before investing in hedge funds.”
“The proposals are intended to help increase the transparency of SFC-authorised
hedge funds so that investors are better informed when making their investment
decisions. In addition, the codification of our existing practices in the authorisation
of hedge funds is intended to assist the market practitioners in seeking authorisation
of their hedge funds,” Mrs Lam said.
The one-month consultation will end on 30 June 2005. Following the consultation,
the SFC will prepare a consultation conclusion document to summarise the views
expressed by the respondents and set out the final revised HF Guidelines. The
revised HF Guidelines will be incorporated into the Code on Unit Trusts and
Mutual Funds, and is expected to take effect in the second half of 2005.