Non-Cash Assets To Plug FTSE Pensions
Monday, March 22, 2010
Significant numbers of the UK's 100 largest listed companies are
looking to directly or indirectly fund their pension scheme deficits
with non-cash assets, such as real estate, intellectual property or
copyright.
According to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), who are advising
numerous companies and trustees in this are the combined pension
deficit of those companies actively looking at non-cash funding could
reduce by GBP10bn (USD15bn), which represents around 10% of the
GBP100bn combined FTSE 100 pensions funding deficit.
Under these non-cash funding agreements, assets (such as real estate
or intellectual property) are either paid directly into the pension
scheme or used as security payable in the event of default or
insolvency. The enhanced security this provides to trustees
enables them to reduce or defer demands for cash contributions from the
sponsor.
Brian Peters, partner and head of non-cash pension funding,
PwC, commented:
“By using non-cash assets like real estate, intellectual property or
copyright to fund its pension scheme, a company can meet trustees’
requests for better scheme security without diverting additional cash
from the business. This is particularly welcome at a time when
deficits are volatile and borrowing is costly. We expect about
10%, or GBP10bn, of the current FTSE 100 pension deficits to have been
funded in this way before the end of the year.
“Property belonging to the sponsoring company has been used as
contingent pension assets before, usually as a promise to the pension
scheme should the company go to the wall. But the increase in use
to fund deficits has been driven by the recognition that this is a
cheaper source of finance than cash, especially at a time when selling
property is likely to be loss-making.
“By clearly articulating the additional security that non-cash
funding can provide to a pension scheme while allowing the sponsoring
business to use its cash to maintain its strength, companies are
helping trustees accept the benefits of these types of
arrangement. They also help to protect the Pension Protection
Fund in the event of the sponsor going insolvent.” |