FSB Examines ETFs And Shadow Banking
Monday, April 18, 2011
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) has published notes on financial stability
issues in relation to exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and on its work to develop recommendations
to strengthen the oversight and regulation of the shadow banking system.
Based in Basel, Switzerland, and established to coordinate at the international level the work of
national financial authorities and international standard setting bodies, the FSB said that it has issued the notes as part of its role of monitoring
market developments relevant to financial stability and advising on their implications
for regulatory policy. In doing so, it seeks to identify potential vulnerabilities
and the actions that may be needed to address them.
The first note highlights recent developments in the ETF market, which has
experienced strong growth and rapid innovation, and in which there has been
an increase in product variety and, in some cases, complexity. It aims at encouraging
the financial industry to adapt risk management practices, disclosure and transparency
to the pace of innovation in this market.
In Rome earlier this month, the FSB had pointed out that there are signs that
the low interest rate environment may be leading investors to search for yield
in more complex non-standard market segments that increase exposure to liquidity
risks. Developments in some segments of the ETF market, but also of the commodities
and high-yield markets, are examples that warrant closer surveillance by regulatory
authorities, it said.
Work is therefore underway nationally and internationally to assess whether
recent innovations and the related increase in complexity in some segments of
the ETF market add to financial system risks and whether regulatory actions
are needed to address potential shortcomings in the management of counterparty,
collateral and liquidity risks, and in market transparency.
The FSB’s second note provides information on the work of the FSB to
develop recommendations to strengthen the oversight and regulation of the shadow
banking system, which it broadly describes as “credit intermediation involving
entities and activities outside the regular banking system.”
Although intermediating credit through non-bank channels can have advantages,
for example by providing an alternative source of funding and liquidity, the
FSB says that, as the recent financial crisis has shown, the shadow banking
system can also be a source of systemic risk both directly and through its interconnectedness
with the regular banking system.
It can also, it adds, create opportunities for arbitrage that might undermine
stricter bank regulation and lead to a build-up of additional leverage and risks
in the system. Enhancing supervision and regulation of the shadow banking system
in areas where systemic risk and regulatory arbitrage concerns are inadequately
addressed is therefore important.
The G20 Leaders at the November 2010 Seoul Summit asked the FSB to develop
recommendations to strengthen the oversight and regulation of the shadow banking
system. The FSB has since formed a task force to develop initial recommendations
for discussion that would clarify what is meant by the shadow banking system;
set out potential approaches for its monitoring; and explore possible regulatory
measures to address the systemic risk and regulatory arbitrage concerns it poses.
The note sets out the current thinking of the task force. It proposes that
monitoring and policy responses should be guided by a two-stage approach: firstly
by casting the net wide to cover all non-bank credit intermediation so as to
identify potential areas where new risks might arise; and then, secondly, by
narrowing the focus to those parts of the system where maturity/liquidity transformation,
flawed credit risk transfer and/or leverage create important systemic risks.
Based on the work of the task force, the FSB will consider initial draft recommendations
at its July plenary meeting and, thereafter, the recommendations to be submitted
to the G20 in the autumn.
The FSB welcomes comments from the public on both of the notes. |